Now we see the change that was promised and the only hope we have is a return to the freedoms that built this country. Obama sought to make this country more like Europe and with double digit unemployment and loss of economic freedoms he has succeeded. Hopefully, this Novermber we will see a return to sanity in Washington, but even with a major GOP win the freedom loving libertarian in me is skeptical.
Efforts to provide insurance coverage to all Americans sounds admirable. Speaking against the latest liberal efforts to extend such coverage is seen as hateful and uncaring. While no sane person wants another to suffer or die because of the cost of healthcare, we must ask what part of the Constitution gives Congress power to manage, or provide medical care for any Americans outside of the military. This element is being ignored by those who have taken oaths to support the Constitution.
This plan is blatant redistribution of wealth. As evidence of it, look at the various ways being considered to pay for this care. One of the latest is a tax on health policies costing $25,000 per year. This means that those who work hard and pay high premiums to get the best coverage would see their own health care costs to provide for others. “Soak the rich,” is a popular mantra of the left, but this promise must be viewed in light of history. Every government welfare program has started with taxes on the rich, but taxes always grow and the tax base always spreads.
Government provided healthcare, regardless of the method or the plan is an unconstitutional siezure and redistribution of wealth. Such programs subsidize bad decisions and punish productivity, while continuing to divide the nation along class lines.
A good friend of mine sent me this and I wanted to share it. Thank to Tom for the following:
It is the month of August, on the shores of the Black Sea. It is raining, and the little town looks totally deserted. It is tough times, everybody is in debt, and everybody lives on credit.
Suddenly, a rich tourist comes to town.
He enters the only hotel, lays a 100 Euro note on the reception counter, and goes to inspect the rooms upstairs in order to pick one.
The hotel proprietor takes the 100 Euro note and runs to pay his debt to the butcher.
The Butcher takes the 100 Euro note, and runs to pay his debt to the pig grower.
The pig grower takes the 100 Euro note, and runs to pay his debt to the supplier of his feed and fuel.
The supplier of feed and fuel takes the 100 Euro note and runs to pay his debt to the town’s prostitute that in these hard times, gave her “services” on credit.
The hooker runs to the hotel, and pays off her debt with the 100 Euro note to the hotel proprietor to pay for the rooms that she rented when she brought her clients there.
The hotel proprietor then lays the 100 Euro note back on the counter so that the rich tourist will not suspect anything.
At that moment, the rich tourist comes down after inspecting the rooms, and takes his 100 Euro note, after saying that he did not like any of the rooms, and leaves town.
No one earned anything. However, the whole town is now without debt, and looks to the future with a lot of optimism..
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how the United States Government is doing business today.
It is official, General Motors has declared bankruptcy and when restructured the US government will own 60% of the company. Of course General Motors and Barack Obama are defending this saying that it makes a GM vehicle a better choice because your warranty will be backed by the US government. One thing not being brought out is the constitutional ground for such an unprecedented action. There is nothing in the Constitution that permits the US government to invest in any business in this way. Think about it, the largest American auto maker is largely government owned.
“If your friend jumped in the river would you follow?” Moms of every generation are famous for that line and even today, as a grown man, it is hard not to roll my eyes at it. This question has been used universally to deny permission to take part in stupidity. It has various versions as well: ‘in the river,’ ‘off a bridge,’ or ‘over a cliff.’ I would propose asking this question of 49 of the 50 states. It is always said: “as California goes, so goes the nation.” Should our nation continue to follow California? (more…)
A good friend of mine Daniel Lanotte has writte a great article on State’s Rights and posted it to his Carpentersmate Blog.
